What Is A Negative Pledge Agreement On Real Estate

the consequences of a breach of the negative collateral provisions Negative pledges often appear in security documents in which they prohibit the person granting the security right from establishing other security rights in the same asset that compete with (or could be of equal priority with) the security right of the first secured creditor under the security document in which the negative pledge appears. Does a lender really have protection against a negative commitment provided by a borrower? In some situations where a lender wants to have collateral for their loan, but the borrower cannot or does not want to grant a mortgage or guarantee to their property, the lender may be satisfied with a negative pledge from the borrower if the borrower agrees not to sell or encumber certain assets without the lender`s consent. If the borrower has granted a mortgage or security right in the assets and the mortgage has been duly registered in the applicable land registries or the security right has been perfected in accordance with the Single Commercial Code, the lender`s rights with respect to the lender`s guarantee and priority over the borrower`s other creditors would be established by law; However, the same is not true for the use of a negative deposit. Definition of automatismAn action is performed in a state of automatism when it is performed by the body without control by the mind (for example. B, it is a spasm or reflex), or when it is performed by a person who is not aware of what they are doing. The act can be described as involuntary, but is not considered as such Because a negative pledge clause increases the security of a bond issue, it often allows issuers to borrow funds at a slightly lower interest rate. This lower interest rate benefits the issuer and creates a win-win situation for both the issuer and the bondholder. The equitable privilege argument is unlikely to succeed in the context of negative commitments. In der Rechtssache Kelly v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 11 F.

Supp. 497, 503 (S.D.N.Y. 1935), the Court held that even if the negative pledge precludes the subsequent privileges in question, no equitable privilege can be created on the basis of that prohibition. New York courts require an agreement to set aside certain assets to create equitable privilege. Furthermore, the Court held that no case has been cited or established in which it has been concluded that a negative agreement has created an adequate privilege […].

Comments Are Closed